Home → Suburbs → Compare
Acacia Hills vs Grindelwald
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
729 #4,429
👥 Population
1,037 #3,921
$816/wk #3,318
💰 Median Weekly Income
$661/wk #6,140
$250/wk #6,115
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$405/wk #1,818
41 years
🎂 Median Age
50 years
$1,517/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,625/mo
$1,842/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,625/wk
$2,122/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,928/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Acacia Hills
13.6%
Affordable
Grindelwald
24.9%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Acacia Hills
♂ 51.2% ♀ 48.8%
Density: 38 people/km²
Grindelwald
♂ 48.9% ♀ 51.1%
Density: 175 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Acacia Hills
Lower Rent Acacia Hills
Larger Population Grindelwald
More Affordable Acacia Hills