Home → Suburbs → Compare
Beaconsfield Upper vs Cockatoo
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
2,997 #2,413
👥 Population
4,408 #1,758
$1,001/wk #1,232
💰 Median Weekly Income
$853/wk #2,727
$368/wk #2,819
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$370/wk #2,711
42 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$2,252/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,742/mo
$2,755/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,991/wk
$2,862/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,196/wk
3.2 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Beaconsfield Upper
13.4%
Affordable
Cockatoo
18.6%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Beaconsfield Upper
♂ 51.4% ♀ 48.6%
Density: 105 people/km²
Cockatoo
♂ 50.7% ♀ 49.3%
Density: 156 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Beaconsfield Upper
Lower Rent Beaconsfield Upper
Larger Population Cockatoo
More Affordable Beaconsfield Upper