Birkenhead vs Torrens Park

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

1,798 #3,179
👥 Population
2,687 #2,599
$858/wk #2,652
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,001/wk #1,232
$315/wk #4,253
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$330/wk #3,803
39 years
🎂 Median Age
43 years
$1,543/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$1,598/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,165/wk
$2,037/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,886/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Birkenhead

19.7%
Affordable

Torrens Park

15.2%
Affordable

Birkenhead

♂ 47.7% ♀ 52.3%
Density: 1976 people/km²

Torrens Park

♂ 48.4% ♀ 51.6%
Density: 1755 people/km²
Higher Income Torrens Park
Lower Rent Birkenhead
Larger Population Torrens Park
More Affordable Torrens Park

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level