Home → Suburbs → Compare
Como vs Beckenham
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
14,786 #291
👥 Population
9,092 #756
$1,001/wk #1,232
💰 Median Weekly Income
$796/wk #3,649
$350/wk #3,104
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$340/wk #3,592
38 years
🎂 Median Age
34 years
$2,041/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,733/mo
$1,780/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,667/wk
$2,550/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,958/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Beckenham
20.4%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Como
♂ 46.6% ♀ 53.4%
Density: 2298 people/km²
Beckenham
♂ 51.5% ♀ 48.5%
Density: 1556 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Como
Lower Rent Beckenham
Larger Population Como
More Affordable Como