Fisher vs Crace

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
3,219 #2,282
👥 Population
4,800 #1,632
$1,206/wk #408
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,395/wk #180
$415/wk #1,663
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$460/wk #939
40 years
🎂 Median Age
34 years
$2,354/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,400/mo
$2,275/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,811/wk
$3,057/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,235/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Fisher

18.2%
Affordable

Crace

16.4%
Affordable

Fisher

♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 2035 people/km²

Crace

♂ 48.8% ♀ 51.2%
Density: 2906 people/km²
Higher Income Crace
Lower Rent Fisher
Larger Population Crace
More Affordable Crace

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level