Fisher vs Turner

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
3,219 #2,282
👥 Population
4,470 #1,739
$1,206/wk #408
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,448/wk #145
$415/wk #1,663
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$480/wk #769
40 years
🎂 Median Age
31 years
$2,354/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,901/mo
$2,275/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,330/wk
$3,057/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,199/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.0 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Fisher

18.2%
Affordable

Turner

20.6%
Affordable

Fisher

♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 2035 people/km²

Turner

♂ 47.5% ♀ 52.5%
Density: 2907 people/km²
Higher Income Turner
Lower Rent Fisher
Larger Population Turner
More Affordable Fisher

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level