Marleston vs Walkerville

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
1,950 #3,068
👥 Population
2,867 #2,489
$746/wk #4,605
💰 Median Weekly Income
$981/wk #1,338
$290/wk #5,154
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$373/wk #2,694
37 years
🎂 Median Age
47 years
$1,528/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$1,418/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,911/wk
$1,895/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,722/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Marleston

20.5%
Affordable

Walkerville

19.5%
Affordable

Marleston

♂ 49.1% ♀ 50.9%
Density: 2019 people/km²

Walkerville

♂ 45.6% ♀ 54.4%
Density: 2343 people/km²
Higher Income Walkerville
Lower Rent Marleston
Larger Population Walkerville
More Affordable Walkerville

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level