Mawson vs Conder

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
3,440 #2,163
👥 Population
5,108 #1,533
$1,158/wk #531
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,179/wk #471
$400/wk #1,854
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$390/wk #2,258
38 years
🎂 Median Age
37 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,148/mo
$2,204/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,574/wk
$2,653/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,907/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Mawson

18.1%
Affordable

Conder

15.2%
Affordable

Mawson

♂ 48.9% ♀ 51.1%
Density: 1628 people/km²

Conder

♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 1129 people/km²
Higher Income Conder
Lower Rent Conder
Larger Population Conder
More Affordable Conder

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level