McKellars Park vs Baw Baw

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

210 #6,834
👥 Population
271 #6,235
$846/wk #2,834
💰 Median Weekly Income
$937/wk #1,752
$340/wk #3,592
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$405/wk #1,818
39 years
🎂 Median Age
45 years
$1,569/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,950/mo
$1,390/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,178/wk
$1,625/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,386/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

McKellars Park

24.5%
Affordable

Baw Baw

18.6%
Affordable

McKellars Park

♂ 50.0% ♀ 50.0%
Density: 476 people/km²

Baw Baw

♂ 52.2% ♀ 47.8%
Density: 5 people/km²
Higher Income Baw Baw
Lower Rent McKellars Park
Larger Population Baw Baw
More Affordable Baw Baw

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level