Nathan vs Cotswold Hills

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
1,085 #3,847
👥 Population
1,620 #3,298
$589/wk #7,241
💰 Median Weekly Income
$912/wk #1,994
$300/wk #4,529
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$390/wk #2,258
28 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$1,950/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,785/mo
$1,682/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,196/wk
$2,213/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,355/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Nathan

17.8%
Affordable

Cotswold Hills

17.8%
Affordable

Nathan

♂ 51.6% ♀ 48.4%
Density: 206 people/km²

Cotswold Hills

♂ 48.3% ♀ 51.7%
Density: 289 people/km²
Higher Income Cotswold Hills
Lower Rent Nathan
Larger Population Cotswold Hills
More Affordable Cotswold Hills

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level