Taroona vs Acton Park

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
3,121 #2,345
👥 Population
2,293 #2,834
$861/wk #2,617
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,058/wk #883
$420/wk #1,513
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$350/wk #3,104
47 years
🎂 Median Age
43 years
$1,733/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$1,845/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,788/wk
$2,364/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,888/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Taroona

22.8%
Affordable

Acton Park

12.6%
Affordable

Taroona

♂ 46.8% ♀ 53.2%
Density: 538 people/km²

Acton Park

♂ 51.8% ♀ 48.2%
Density: 119 people/km²
Higher Income Acton Park
Lower Rent Acton Park
Larger Population Taroona
More Affordable Acton Park

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level