Home → Suburbs → Compare
Toorak Gardens vs Kidman Park
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
2,604 #2,653
👥 Population
3,874 #1,968
$1,068/wk #837
💰 Median Weekly Income
$798/wk #3,630
$320/wk #4,051
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$358/wk #3,047
47 years
🎂 Median Age
44 years
$2,575/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,869/mo
$2,286/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,637/wk
$3,239/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,084/wk
— people
🏡 Household Size
— people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Toorak Gardens
14.0%
Affordable
Kidman Park
21.9%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Toorak Gardens
♂ 47.3% ♀ 52.7%
Density: 2385 people/km²
Kidman Park
♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 2169 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Toorak Gardens
Lower Rent Toorak Gardens
Larger Population Kidman Park
More Affordable Toorak Gardens