Amata vs Uraidla

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
393 #5,452
👥 Population
581 #4,795
$284/wk #8,856
💰 Median Weekly Income
$872/wk #2,475
$80/wk #8,727
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$385/wk #2,381
28 years
🎂 Median Age
43 years
$0/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,800/mo
$1,062/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,079/wk
$664/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,537/wk
4.0 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Amata

7.5%
Affordable

Uraidla

18.5%
Affordable

Amata

♂ 45.4% ♀ 54.6%
Density: 35 people/km²

Uraidla

♂ 46.6% ♀ 53.4%
Density: 167 people/km²
Higher Income Uraidla
Lower Rent Amata
Larger Population Uraidla
More Affordable Amata

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level