Home → Suburbs → Compare
Bairnsdale vs Chirnside Park
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
7,905 #895
👥 Population
11,779 #470
$634/wk #6,551
💰 Median Weekly Income
$852/wk #2,739
$270/wk #5,664
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$443/wk #1,241
44 years
🎂 Median Age
38 years
$1,192/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$1,101/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,084/wk
$1,429/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,316/wk
2.2 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Bairnsdale
24.5%
Affordable
Chirnside Park
21.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Bairnsdale
♂ 46.8% ♀ 53.2%
Density: 124 people/km²
Chirnside Park
♂ 49.1% ♀ 50.9%
Density: 531 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Chirnside Park
Lower Rent Bairnsdale
Larger Population Chirnside Park
More Affordable Bairnsdale