Fisher vs Kambah

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
3,219 #2,282
👥 Population
15,670 #250
$1,206/wk #408
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,070/wk #830
$415/wk #1,663
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$400/wk #1,854
40 years
🎂 Median Age
41 years
$2,354/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,000/mo
$2,275/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,207/wk
$3,057/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,630/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.6 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Fisher

18.2%
Affordable

Kambah

18.1%
Affordable

Fisher

♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 2035 people/km²

Kambah

♂ 49.7% ♀ 50.3%
Density: 1382 people/km²
Higher Income Fisher
Lower Rent Kambah
Larger Population Kambah
More Affordable Kambah

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level