Home → Suburbs → Compare
Huntingdale vs Swanbourne
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
9,021 #763
👥 Population
4,592 #1,691
$767/wk #4,186
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,362/wk #209
$350/wk #3,104
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$470/wk #852
35 years
🎂 Median Age
38 years
$1,670/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$3,504/mo
$1,785/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$3,418/wk
$1,976/wk
👪 Family Income
$4,179/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Huntingdale
19.6%
Affordable
Swanbourne
13.8%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Huntingdale
♂ 49.9% ♀ 50.1%
Density: 1882 people/km²
Swanbourne
♂ 51.2% ♀ 48.8%
Density: 874 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Swanbourne
Lower Rent Huntingdale
Larger Population Huntingdale
More Affordable Huntingdale