Amata vs Farrell Flat

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
393 #5,452
👥 Population
201 #6,950
$284/wk #8,856
💰 Median Weekly Income
$564/wk #7,560
$80/wk #8,727
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$200/wk #7,374
28 years
🎂 Median Age
50 years
$0/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$802/mo
$1,062/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,111/wk
$664/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,300/wk
4.0 people
🏡 Household Size
2.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Amata

7.5%
Affordable

Farrell Flat

18.0%
Affordable

Amata

♂ 45.4% ♀ 54.6%
Density: 35 people/km²

Farrell Flat

♂ 52.0% ♀ 48.0%
Density: 2 people/km²
Higher Income Farrell Flat
Lower Rent Amata
Larger Population Amata
More Affordable Amata

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level