Anstead vs Wights Mountain

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
1,522 #3,375
👥 Population
767 #4,354
$1,074/wk #817
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,092/wk #743
$490/wk #714
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$350/wk #3,104
43 years
🎂 Median Age
48 years
$2,383/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,507/mo
$2,926/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$3,091/wk
$2,982/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,106/wk
3.1 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Anstead

16.7%
Affordable

Wights Mountain

11.3%
Affordable

Anstead

♂ 50.0% ♀ 50.0%
Density: 110 people/km²

Wights Mountain

♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 89 people/km²
Higher Income Wights Mountain
Lower Rent Wights Mountain
Larger Population Anstead
More Affordable Wights Mountain

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level