Home → Suburbs → Compare
Bannockburn vs Cranbourne South
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
6,470 #1,193
👥 Population
3,241 #2,266
$845/wk #2,852
💰 Median Weekly Income
$979/wk #1,353
$390/wk #2,258
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$470/wk #852
35 years
🎂 Median Age
35 years
$1,863/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$2,055/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,278/wk
$2,232/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,361/wk
3.0 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Bannockburn
19.0%
Affordable
Cranbourne South
20.6%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Bannockburn
♂ 50.2% ♀ 49.8%
Density: 78 people/km²
Cranbourne South
♂ 49.5% ♀ 50.5%
Density: 162 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Cranbourne South
Lower Rent Bannockburn
Larger Population Bannockburn
More Affordable Bannockburn