Home → Suburbs → Compare
Bathurst vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
7,001 #1,053
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$753/wk #4,460
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$300/wk #4,529
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
41 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$1,517/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$1,209/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$1,648/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
1.9 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Bathurst
24.8%
Affordable
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Bathurst
♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 1189 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Bathurst
Larger Population Bathurst
More Affordable Bathurst