Home → Suburbs → Compare
Beaconsfield vs Cudal
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
1,172 #3,746
👥 Population
586 #4,784
$1,462/wk #137
💰 Median Weekly Income
$716/wk #5,172
$650/wk #121
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$256/wk #6,032
33 years
🎂 Median Age
44 years
$2,990/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,300/mo
$3,061/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,312/wk
$3,510/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,792/wk
2.4 people
🏡 Household Size
2.4 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Beaconsfield
21.2%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Beaconsfield
♂ 51.9% ♀ 48.1%
Density: 7736 people/km²
Cudal
♂ 54.7% ♀ 45.3%
Density: 4 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Beaconsfield
Lower Rent Cudal
Larger Population Beaconsfield
More Affordable Cudal