Home → Suburbs → Compare
Beaconsfield vs Burnie
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
1,362 #3,529
👥 Population
693 #4,514
$518/wk #8,034
💰 Median Weekly Income
$710/wk #5,302
$230/wk #6,811
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$240/wk #6,627
46 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$953/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,083/mo
$934/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,064/wk
$1,293/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,687/wk
2.2 people
🏡 Household Size
1.8 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Beaconsfield
24.6%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Beaconsfield
♂ 52.0% ♀ 48.0%
Density: 16 people/km²
Burnie
♂ 49.1% ♀ 50.9%
Density: 516 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Burnie
Lower Rent Beaconsfield
Larger Population Beaconsfield
More Affordable Beaconsfield