Home → Suburbs → Compare
Beverley Park vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
2,646 #2,626
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$859/wk #2,643
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$540/wk #435
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
42 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$3,000/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$2,242/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$2,586/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Beverley Park
24.1%
Affordable
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Beverley Park
♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 2632 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Beverley Park
Larger Population Acacia Gardens
More Affordable Beverley Park