Blue Mountain Heights vs Mount Tarampa

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
988 #4,003
👥 Population
501 #5,028
$971/wk #1,423
💰 Median Weekly Income
$609/wk #6,950
$400/wk #1,854
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$340/wk #3,592
47 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$2,000/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,706/mo
$2,392/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,424/wk
$2,508/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,542/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Blue Mountain Heights

16.7%
Affordable

Mount Tarampa

23.9%
Affordable

Blue Mountain Heights

♂ 50.0% ♀ 50.0%
Density: 257 people/km²

Mount Tarampa

♂ 53.4% ♀ 46.6%
Density: 16 people/km²
Higher Income Blue Mountain Heights
Lower Rent Mount Tarampa
Larger Population Blue Mountain Heights
More Affordable Mount Tarampa

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level