Home → Suburbs → Compare
Bourkelands vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
3,113 #2,348
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$1,003/wk #1,216
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$360/wk #2,908
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
35 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$1,733/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$2,203/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$2,464/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Bourkelands
16.3%
Affordable
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Bourkelands
♂ 46.8% ♀ 53.2%
Density: 1482 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Bourkelands
Larger Population Acacia Gardens
More Affordable Bourkelands