Home → Suburbs → Compare
Brighton vs Chirnside Park
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
23,252 #107
👥 Population
11,779 #470
$1,259/wk #328
💰 Median Weekly Income
$852/wk #2,739
$600/wk #202
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$443/wk #1,241
48 years
🎂 Median Age
38 years
$3,467/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$2,710/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,084/wk
$3,778/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,316/wk
2.4 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Brighton
22.1%
Affordable
Chirnside Park
21.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Brighton
♂ 47.1% ♀ 52.9%
Density: 2778 people/km²
Chirnside Park
♂ 49.1% ♀ 50.9%
Density: 531 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Brighton
Lower Rent Chirnside Park
Larger Population Brighton
More Affordable Chirnside Park