Byfield vs McKinlay

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
323 #5,867
👥 Population
162 #7,534
$487/wk #8,351
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,562/wk #93
$235/wk #6,749
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$285/wk #5,291
48 years
🎂 Median Age
37 years
$1,344/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$0/mo
$1,018/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,166/wk
$1,233/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,874/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.3 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Byfield

23.1%
Affordable

McKinlay

13.2%
Affordable

Byfield

♂ 54.2% ♀ 45.8%
Density: 2 people/km²

McKinlay

♂ 74.4% ♀ 25.6%
Density: 0 people/km²
Higher Income McKinlay
Lower Rent Byfield
Larger Population Byfield
More Affordable Byfield

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level