Camden Park vs Nana Glen

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
2,233 #2,870
👥 Population
1,132 #3,791
$1,084/wk #769
💰 Median Weekly Income
$688/wk #5,690
$420/wk #1,513
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$350/wk #3,104
39 years
🎂 Median Age
44 years
$2,600/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,733/mo
$3,219/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,540/wk
$3,317/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,845/wk
3.3 people
🏡 Household Size
2.7 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Camden Park

13.0%
Affordable

Nana Glen

22.7%
Affordable

Camden Park

♂ 48.2% ♀ 51.8%
Density: 215 people/km²

Nana Glen

♂ 50.9% ♀ 49.1%
Density: 17 people/km²
Higher Income Camden Park
Lower Rent Nana Glen
Larger Population Camden Park
More Affordable Nana Glen

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level