Home → Suburbs → Compare
Cams Wharf vs Back Forest
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
182 #7,222
👥 Population
91
$774/wk #4,056
💰 Median Weekly Income
$632/wk
$430/wk #1,360
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$252/wk
56 years
🎂 Median Age
56 years
$1,400/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$4,768/mo
$1,385/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,374/wk
$1,666/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,833/wk
2.1 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Cams Wharf
31.0%
Moderate Stress
Back Forest
18.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Cams Wharf
♂ 47.5% ♀ 52.5%
Density: 218 people/km²
Back Forest
♂ 47.9% ♀ 52.1%
Density: 15 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Cams Wharf
Lower Rent Back Forest
Larger Population Cams Wharf
More Affordable Back Forest