Casey vs Dickson

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
6,471 #1,192
👥 Population
3,292 #2,232
$1,349/wk #228
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,303/wk #277
$502/wk #573
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$500/wk #576
32 years
🎂 Median Age
30 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,904/mo
$2,680/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,277/wk
$2,967/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,895/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Casey

18.7%
Affordable

Dickson

22.0%
Affordable

Casey

♂ 49.4% ♀ 50.6%
Density: 2467 people/km²

Dickson

♂ 48.6% ♀ 51.4%
Density: 2086 people/km²
Higher Income Casey
Lower Rent Dickson
Larger Population Casey
More Affordable Dickson

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level