Casula vs Kingscliff

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
16,584 #223
👥 Population
8,355 #843
$645/wk #6,354
💰 Median Weekly Income
$778/wk #3,981
$450/wk #1,049
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$490/wk #714
36 years
🎂 Median Age
47 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,200/mo
$1,730/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,575/wk
$1,917/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,051/wk
3.2 people
🏡 Household Size
2.4 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Casula

26.0%
Moderate Stress

Kingscliff

31.1%
Moderate Stress

Casula

♂ 49.1% ♀ 50.9%
Density: 2345 people/km²

Kingscliff

♂ 47.4% ♀ 52.6%
Density: 1330 people/km²
Higher Income Kingscliff
Lower Rent Casula
Larger Population Casula
More Affordable Casula

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level