Catherine Field vs Acacia Gardens

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
2,609 #2,648
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$885/wk #2,307
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$520/wk #502
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
33 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$2,500/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$2,316/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$2,298/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
3.3 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Catherine Field

22.5%
Affordable

Acacia Gardens

19.3%
Affordable

Catherine Field

♂ 52.3% ♀ 47.7%
Density: 253 people/km²

Acacia Gardens

♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Catherine Field
Larger Population Acacia Gardens
More Affordable Catherine Field

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level