Home → Suburbs → Compare
Chandlers Hill vs Glenburnie
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
792 #4,313
👥 Population
396 #5,433
$1,025/wk #1,066
💰 Median Weekly Income
$739/wk #4,750
$370/wk #2,711
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$180/wk #7,868
46 years
🎂 Median Age
45 years
$1,946/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,393/mo
$2,654/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,910/wk
$2,673/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,083/wk
3.0 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Chandlers Hill
13.9%
Affordable
Glenburnie
9.4%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Chandlers Hill
♂ 49.1% ♀ 50.9%
Density: 75 people/km²
Glenburnie
♂ 49.0% ♀ 51.0%
Density: 5 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Chandlers Hill
Lower Rent Glenburnie
Larger Population Chandlers Hill
More Affordable Glenburnie