Cockatoo vs Golden Point

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
4,408 #1,758
👥 Population
2,217 #2,884
$853/wk #2,727
💰 Median Weekly Income
$757/wk #4,390
$370/wk #2,711
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$290/wk #5,154
36 years
🎂 Median Age
40 years
$1,742/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,300/mo
$1,991/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,309/wk
$2,196/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,709/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.1 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Cockatoo

18.6%
Affordable

Golden Point

22.2%
Affordable

Cockatoo

♂ 50.7% ♀ 49.3%
Density: 156 people/km²

Golden Point

♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 1199 people/km²
Higher Income Cockatoo
Lower Rent Golden Point
Larger Population Cockatoo
More Affordable Golden Point

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level