Conder vs Pearce

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
5,108 #1,533
👥 Population
2,687 #2,599
$1,179/wk #471
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,222/wk #384
$390/wk #2,258
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$430/wk #1,360
37 years
🎂 Median Age
43 years
$2,148/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,383/mo
$2,574/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,362/wk
$2,907/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,302/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Conder

15.2%
Affordable

Pearce

18.2%
Affordable

Conder

♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 1129 people/km²

Pearce

♂ 49.9% ♀ 50.1%
Density: 1578 people/km²
Higher Income Pearce
Lower Rent Conder
Larger Population Conder
More Affordable Conder

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level