Copacabana vs Stanwell Park

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
2,809 #2,523
👥 Population
1,532 #3,367
$893/wk #2,215
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,110/wk #675
$510/wk #547
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$460/wk #939
43 years
🎂 Median Age
45 years
$2,300/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,675/mo
$2,143/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,798/wk
$2,403/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,137/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Copacabana

23.8%
Affordable

Stanwell Park

16.4%
Affordable

Copacabana

♂ 49.4% ♀ 50.6%
Density: 1407 people/km²

Stanwell Park

♂ 51.7% ♀ 48.3%
Density: 505 people/km²
Higher Income Stanwell Park
Lower Rent Stanwell Park
Larger Population Copacabana
More Affordable Stanwell Park

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level