Home → Suburbs → Compare
Downside vs Caloola
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
124 #8,328
👥 Population
62
$969/wk #1,444
💰 Median Weekly Income
$866/wk
$185/wk #7,826
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$175/wk
46 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$1,733/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$643/mo
$2,583/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,458/wk
$2,833/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,875/wk
2.6 people
🏡 Household Size
2.4 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
👥 Demographics
Downside
♂ 50.8% ♀ 49.2%
Density: 2 people/km²
Caloola
♂ 54.2% ♀ 45.8%
Density: 0 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Downside
Lower Rent Caloola
Larger Population Downside
More Affordable Caloola