Home → Suburbs → Compare
Eureka vs Fassifern Valley
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
223 #6,677
👥 Population
112 #8,623
$431/wk #8,721
💰 Median Weekly Income
$749/wk #4,532
$400/wk #1,854
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$350/wk #3,104
51 years
🎂 Median Age
43 years
$1,117/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,767/mo
$1,166/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,562/wk
$1,208/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,791/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Eureka
34.3%
Moderate Stress
Fassifern Valley
22.4%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Eureka
♂ 50.7% ♀ 49.3%
Density: 2 people/km²
Fassifern Valley
♂ 49.1% ♀ 50.9%
Density: 13 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Fassifern Valley
Lower Rent Fassifern Valley
Larger Population Eureka
More Affordable Fassifern Valley