Farrar vs Tindal

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
1,650 #3,276
👥 Population
850 #4,203
$1,172/wk #489
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,513/wk #117
$455/wk #1,017
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$260/wk #5,884
32 years
🎂 Median Age
29 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$0/mo
$2,573/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,865/wk
$2,741/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,929/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
3.1 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Farrar

17.7%
Affordable

Tindal

9.1%
Affordable

Farrar

♂ 48.3% ♀ 51.7%
Density: 1122 people/km²

Tindal

♂ 55.0% ♀ 45.0%
Density: 8 people/km²
Higher Income Tindal
Lower Rent Tindal
Larger Population Farrar
More Affordable Tindal

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level