Farrer vs Taylor

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
3,787 #2,012
👥 Population
2,220 #2,879
$1,223/wk #380
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,113/wk #659
$450/wk #1,049
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$282/wk #5,369
43 years
🎂 Median Age
30 years
$2,600/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,500/mo
$2,540/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,655/wk
$3,226/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,527/wk
2.6 people
🏡 Household Size
3.4 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Farrer

17.7%
Affordable

Taylor

10.6%
Affordable

Farrer

♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 1831 people/km²

Taylor

♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 544 people/km²
Higher Income Farrer
Lower Rent Taylor
Larger Population Farrer
More Affordable Taylor

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level