Fig Tree Pocket vs Chuwar

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
4,345 #1,781
👥 Population
2,178 #2,910
$1,205/wk #410
💰 Median Weekly Income
$930/wk #1,807
$590/wk #259
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$350/wk #3,104
40 years
🎂 Median Age
37 years
$3,033/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,863/mo
$3,791/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,247/wk
$4,226/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,415/wk
3.2 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Fig Tree Pocket

15.6%
Affordable

Chuwar

15.6%
Affordable

Fig Tree Pocket

♂ 50.2% ♀ 49.8%
Density: 1015 people/km²

Chuwar

♂ 50.3% ♀ 49.7%
Density: 121 people/km²
Higher Income Fig Tree Pocket
Lower Rent Chuwar
Larger Population Fig Tree Pocket
More Affordable Chuwar

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level