Fishing Point vs Stanwell Park

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
1,105 #3,823
👥 Population
1,532 #3,367
$787/wk #3,801
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,110/wk #675
$430/wk #1,360
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$460/wk #939
51 years
🎂 Median Age
45 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,675/mo
$1,755/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,798/wk
$1,989/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,137/wk
2.4 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Fishing Point

24.5%
Affordable

Stanwell Park

16.4%
Affordable

Fishing Point

♂ 50.5% ♀ 49.5%
Density: 1658 people/km²

Stanwell Park

♂ 51.7% ♀ 48.3%
Density: 505 people/km²
Higher Income Stanwell Park
Lower Rent Fishing Point
Larger Population Stanwell Park
More Affordable Fishing Point

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level