Fitzgerald vs Stonehenge

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
33
👥 Population
17
$483/wk
💰 Median Weekly Income
$900/wk
$200/wk
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$188/wk
49 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$480/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$0/mo
$860/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,750/wk
$974/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,750/wk
2.3 people
🏡 Household Size
3.0 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Fitzgerald

23.3%
Affordable

Stonehenge

6.8%
Affordable

Fitzgerald

♂ 47.2% ♀ 52.8%
Density: 4 people/km²

Stonehenge

♂ 63.6% ♀ 36.4%
Density: 0 people/km²
Higher Income Stonehenge
Lower Rent Stonehenge
Larger Population Fitzgerald
More Affordable Stonehenge

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level