Home → Suburbs → Compare
Fulham Gardens vs Kidman Park
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
6,573 #1,164
👥 Population
3,874 #1,968
$767/wk #4,186
💰 Median Weekly Income
$798/wk #3,630
$370/wk #2,711
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$358/wk #3,047
45 years
🎂 Median Age
44 years
$1,950/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,869/mo
$1,595/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,637/wk
$2,012/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,084/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Fulham Gardens
23.2%
Affordable
Kidman Park
21.9%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Fulham Gardens
♂ 48.4% ♀ 51.6%
Density: 2720 people/km²
Kidman Park
♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 2169 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Kidman Park
Lower Rent Kidman Park
Larger Population Fulham Gardens
More Affordable Kidman Park