Home → Suburbs → Compare
Furner vs Cunningham
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
156 #7,659
👥 Population
78
$944/wk #1,672
💰 Median Weekly Income
$900/wk
$160/wk #8,125
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$275/wk
44 years
🎂 Median Age
35 years
$837/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,000/mo
$1,625/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,937/wk
$1,875/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,071/wk
2.6 people
🏡 Household Size
3.1 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Cunningham
14.2%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Furner
♂ 50.6% ♀ 49.4%
Density: 1 people/km²
Cunningham
♂ 52.6% ♀ 47.4%
Density: 1 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Furner
Lower Rent Furner
Larger Population Furner
More Affordable Furner