Home → Suburbs → Compare
Glen Alpine vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
4,429 #1,755
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$883/wk #2,336
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$570/wk #315
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
43 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$2,669/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$2,653/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
3.2 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Glen Alpine
21.4%
Affordable
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Glen Alpine
♂ 50.2% ♀ 49.8%
Density: 826 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Acacia Gardens
Larger Population Glen Alpine
More Affordable Acacia Gardens