Home → Suburbs → Compare
Glen Alpine vs Camden Park
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
4,429 #1,755
👥 Population
2,233 #2,870
$883/wk #2,336
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,084/wk #769
$570/wk #315
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$420/wk #1,513
43 years
🎂 Median Age
39 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,600/mo
$2,669/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$3,219/wk
$2,653/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,317/wk
3.2 people
🏡 Household Size
3.3 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Glen Alpine
21.4%
Affordable
Camden Park
13.0%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Glen Alpine
♂ 50.2% ♀ 49.8%
Density: 826 people/km²
Camden Park
♂ 48.2% ♀ 51.8%
Density: 215 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Camden Park
Lower Rent Camden Park
Larger Population Glen Alpine
More Affordable Camden Park