Gleneagle vs Bucca

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
2,106 #2,944
👥 Population
1,063 #3,884
$711/wk #5,279
💰 Median Weekly Income
$574/wk #7,473
$335/wk #3,743
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$260/wk #5,884
35 years
🎂 Median Age
47 years
$1,733/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,213/mo
$1,490/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,281/wk
$1,653/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,389/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.7 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Gleneagle

22.5%
Affordable

Bucca

20.3%
Affordable

Gleneagle

♂ 48.6% ♀ 51.4%
Density: 67 people/km²

Bucca

♂ 50.8% ♀ 49.2%
Density: 6 people/km²
Higher Income Gleneagle
Lower Rent Bucca
Larger Population Gleneagle
More Affordable Bucca

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level