Greta vs Acacia Gardens

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
3,349 #2,207
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$803/wk #3,580
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$360/wk #2,908
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
33 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$1,755/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$1,929/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$2,207/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Greta

18.7%
Affordable

Acacia Gardens

19.3%
Affordable

Greta

♂ 50.1% ♀ 49.9%
Density: 162 people/km²

Acacia Gardens

♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Greta
Larger Population Acacia Gardens
More Affordable Greta

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level