Gurley vs Downside

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
248 #6,436
👥 Population
124 #8,328
$860/wk #2,627
💰 Median Weekly Income
$969/wk #1,444
$200/wk #7,374
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$185/wk #7,826
42 years
🎂 Median Age
46 years
$618/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,733/mo
$1,562/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,583/wk
$1,937/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,833/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.6 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Gurley

12.8%
Affordable

Downside

7.2%
Affordable

Gurley

♂ 53.8% ♀ 46.2%
Density: 0 people/km²

Downside

♂ 50.8% ♀ 49.2%
Density: 2 people/km²
Higher Income Downside
Lower Rent Downside
Larger Population Gurley
More Affordable Downside

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level